An idea, that I wanted to spread in the blogosphere. Let me know if you like it and see if you can implement it
If all popular bloggers who don't really rely on blogging for paychecks, sign up for Google Ads and lend all that money through Kiva (www.kiva.org), it would be a great service. On one hand, you'll not loose any money as that would come back 80% of the cases, and on the other, you'll be doing a great service to the struggling entrepreneurs and micro businesses in the third world countries.
So, all the wannabe-MBA bloggers who get thousands of hits every day, just think about this. Maybe, we could ask ClearAdmit and Kiva to give "Best-of-lending-blog" awards too :)
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
A thing about GMAT
I've been advising a few people about how to prepare for GMAT and lately, there have been a few more asking the same questions - How to tackle GMAT? How to get a score above 700? How should I start my preparation? What should I focus on first, Quant or Verbal etc etc.
The questions range from too generic to too specific. I thought may be a few others too could get my gyan on GMAT, if it sounds convincing enough !
My answer to all the questions begins with - know the GMAT, know yourself and have a strategy.
I believe that rather than preparing for GMAT (unless you're an awesome test taker and score at least a 700 in your first mock test , unprepared !), it's always better to learn how to prepare for GMAT. It's more of unlearning what you think you know and actually learn and know what's exactly in it. Know more about the areas GMAT tests you in. Quant and Verbal are too broad too classify for the not-so good of us.
Next, knowing your weaknesses and strengths in all aspects of the GMAT lets you prepare better. For example, if you're an Indian from a good engineering school, you're already pretty good at math to score at least a 49 in GMAT Quant but Verbal section may be a big weakness. But if you consider Verbal as a whole, it is sure to give you goosebumps. So learn what you are good at. May be you're good at grammar (SC) but not at reasoning(CR) or you're good at reading (RC) but not at grammar(SC). It helps to know your pain-points so that you can tackle them more aggessively and tread more cautiously.
Let's take my case as an example. I was good at math and never faced a question that I couldn't answer given the generous time in GMAT, but I did it too fast, fast enough to ignore those finer details in Data Sufficiency and used to make atleat 5-6 mistakes in DS not that I didn't know how to but because I wasn't patient enough. So, I made it a point to go slow at the DS questions and double-check that I was right. It helped..it helped to the fact that I got a 50 in Quant away from the 47-48 I used to get earlier.
But again, it's always better to stress on the specifics - like if you're doing a mistake only in say, idiom-related questions in SC, it doesn't make sense to go through all of SC again and again and not focusing on the issue at hand. So get to the specifics and note them down
So know your weaknesses but how do you tackle them?
That's where planning and strategy comes in. Having a strategy doesn't mean how many hours a day, or how much study material you covered. It's about how you're doing to overcome your specific weakness - what are the steps you need to take to actually overcome them. For example, I knew that inference questions in RC was a weak point of mine, which ask us for an answer based on an excerpt in the essay. So I made of note like this - "Process of Elimination may not work for Inference Qs. Don’t just read the paragraph again from where the inference is drawn from. Read all information related to that subject (might be in different paragraphs and with different names) make points and check with answers." or something like this in CR - "Correct Answers do not deviate from conclusion - Eliminate anything that deviates from conclusion. This made it easier for me to tackle the specifics and not beat around the bush wondering why Iam not good at RC or CR.
So, follow these,make note of your progress, and you won't need to add a mystifying aura to GMAT :) Hope this long long post helps !
The questions range from too generic to too specific. I thought may be a few others too could get my gyan on GMAT, if it sounds convincing enough !
My answer to all the questions begins with - know the GMAT, know yourself and have a strategy.
I believe that rather than preparing for GMAT (unless you're an awesome test taker and score at least a 700 in your first mock test , unprepared !), it's always better to learn how to prepare for GMAT. It's more of unlearning what you think you know and actually learn and know what's exactly in it. Know more about the areas GMAT tests you in. Quant and Verbal are too broad too classify for the not-so good of us.
Next, knowing your weaknesses and strengths in all aspects of the GMAT lets you prepare better. For example, if you're an Indian from a good engineering school, you're already pretty good at math to score at least a 49 in GMAT Quant but Verbal section may be a big weakness. But if you consider Verbal as a whole, it is sure to give you goosebumps. So learn what you are good at. May be you're good at grammar (SC) but not at reasoning(CR) or you're good at reading (RC) but not at grammar(SC). It helps to know your pain-points so that you can tackle them more aggessively and tread more cautiously.
Let's take my case as an example. I was good at math and never faced a question that I couldn't answer given the generous time in GMAT, but I did it too fast, fast enough to ignore those finer details in Data Sufficiency and used to make atleat 5-6 mistakes in DS not that I didn't know how to but because I wasn't patient enough. So, I made it a point to go slow at the DS questions and double-check that I was right. It helped..it helped to the fact that I got a 50 in Quant away from the 47-48 I used to get earlier.
But again, it's always better to stress on the specifics - like if you're doing a mistake only in say, idiom-related questions in SC, it doesn't make sense to go through all of SC again and again and not focusing on the issue at hand. So get to the specifics and note them down
So know your weaknesses but how do you tackle them?
That's where planning and strategy comes in. Having a strategy doesn't mean how many hours a day, or how much study material you covered. It's about how you're doing to overcome your specific weakness - what are the steps you need to take to actually overcome them. For example, I knew that inference questions in RC was a weak point of mine, which ask us for an answer based on an excerpt in the essay. So I made of note like this - "Process of Elimination may not work for Inference Qs. Don’t just read the paragraph again from where the inference is drawn from. Read all information related to that subject (might be in different paragraphs and with different names) make points and check with answers." or something like this in CR - "Correct Answers do not deviate from conclusion - Eliminate anything that deviates from conclusion. This made it easier for me to tackle the specifics and not beat around the bush wondering why Iam not good at RC or CR.
So, follow these,make note of your progress, and you won't need to add a mystifying aura to GMAT :) Hope this long long post helps !
Monday, June 22, 2009
Essays and Deadlines are out
I guess Iam probably late in announcing this in the blogosphere but still here I go - essays and deadlines are out for Kellogg, MIT Sloan, Wharton, HBS and Stanford.
I may not be applying to any of the above except Kellogg, my dream school, only next to INSEAD. I went through the essays a few days back and also prepared outlines for them, it's all about giving them a shape now(which, of course, is the difficult part and will take me atleast a month to do so).
You could check some detailed analysis about the essays here. I you ask me, there isn't anything surprising about Kellogg's essays. They're the same as the essays of earlier years but as always they do reflect upon Kellogg's reputation for looking at leadership and collaboration, both inside and outside of your professional life.
So good luck and god speed !
I may not be applying to any of the above except Kellogg, my dream school, only next to INSEAD. I went through the essays a few days back and also prepared outlines for them, it's all about giving them a shape now(which, of course, is the difficult part and will take me atleast a month to do so).
You could check some detailed analysis about the essays here. I you ask me, there isn't anything surprising about Kellogg's essays. They're the same as the essays of earlier years but as always they do reflect upon Kellogg's reputation for looking at leadership and collaboration, both inside and outside of your professional life.
So good luck and god speed !
Thursday, June 11, 2009
Kellogg Information Session - Chennai
UPDATE : The date has been confirmed as 11th July between 6-8 pm . Please refer to the following link for more information reg the event - http://www.kellogg. northwestern. edu/Programs/ FullTimeMBA/ Admissions_ Events/Off_ Campus_Events. aspx
If there are any Indian MBA aspirants around and luckily land on my blog, please do note that there's a Kellogg Information Session in Chennai on July 04 (tentative date). If you're interested, send a mail across to Karthik Raman (ramankarthik@gmail.com) , Kellogg '09, with your confirmation.
Good luck !!
PS : Pls leave a comment on my blog if you're attending too, we could meet up during the session
If there are any Indian MBA aspirants around and luckily land on my blog, please do note that there's a Kellogg Information Session in Chennai on July 04 (tentative date). If you're interested, send a mail across to Karthik Raman (ramankarthik@gmail.com) , Kellogg '09, with your confirmation.
Good luck !!
PS : Pls leave a comment on my blog if you're attending too, we could meet up during the session
Thursday, May 21, 2009
Should I or shouldn't I
As is my habit, I've been procrastinating after I dumped the idea of applying to bschool last year and lo ! , this year's application process in on the cards already. The only thought that shot through all my nerves was - "God damn it, will I ever apply to b-school?" and still I can't decide if I want to.
On one hand, it seems to be the right time, and on the other, it doesn't seem to be.
I am the co-founder and a CTO of a tech startup, which is sustaining itself, although I can't say it's profitable. I am in a position where I know that an MBA would definitely take me to the next level, but I am worried about the business at hand. Will I be able to concentrate as much once I start the apping process? Will I be able to contribute if at all I go into a b-school? What if it's a 2-yr MBA, do I have to leave MY company?
I don't know how entrepreneurs decide when it's time for an MBA. Do I need to find a replacement for myself (I mean, can I trust someone to be my replacement, do the things I do the same way I wanted them to be done). Aah.. I definitely need some counselling here.
On one hand, it seems to be the right time, and on the other, it doesn't seem to be.
I am the co-founder and a CTO of a tech startup, which is sustaining itself, although I can't say it's profitable. I am in a position where I know that an MBA would definitely take me to the next level, but I am worried about the business at hand. Will I be able to concentrate as much once I start the apping process? Will I be able to contribute if at all I go into a b-school? What if it's a 2-yr MBA, do I have to leave MY company?
I don't know how entrepreneurs decide when it's time for an MBA. Do I need to find a replacement for myself (I mean, can I trust someone to be my replacement, do the things I do the same way I wanted them to be done). Aah.. I definitely need some counselling here.
Friday, April 3, 2009
Ghost Twitterers
I was always skeptical about the use of Twitter by celebrities. Countless blogs and news articles opined about the use of twitter as a tool to bring people more closer than any other social networking site., how you can follow famous people without intruding space and get insights into their ideas and philosophy
But wait a minute, are you really following the celebrity you thought you were following. Chances are that you might not. Apparently, celebrities are employing people for tweeting on their behalf, a third-person to keep their Twitter page live(just like they did with the other social networkig sites) in a new marketing job position that sprung up, what is being termed as a "Ghost Twitterer". Check the article in NYTimes here that dwelves into the issue.
Now this is fine for getting updates about a celebrity's schedules and latest news. But definitely NOT for getting an insight into their thoughts and ideas because they aren't the real person's but a third-person's who tweets just what she interprets and not what she thinks.
I don't see a point in following such ghost twitterers who just tweets continuosly. All she would want is post interesting articles that get re-tweeted and thus increase the followers' numbers and consequently, the popularity.
Twitter has been very careful about spammers and fakes and has been deleting their profiles quite often but can they do anything about this. Definitely not I guess.
So, it's upto you to follow the "celebrity" whose tweets arent always his/her own thoughts
But wait a minute, are you really following the celebrity you thought you were following. Chances are that you might not. Apparently, celebrities are employing people for tweeting on their behalf, a third-person to keep their Twitter page live(just like they did with the other social networkig sites) in a new marketing job position that sprung up, what is being termed as a "Ghost Twitterer". Check the article in NYTimes here that dwelves into the issue.
Now this is fine for getting updates about a celebrity's schedules and latest news. But definitely NOT for getting an insight into their thoughts and ideas because they aren't the real person's but a third-person's who tweets just what she interprets and not what she thinks.
I don't see a point in following such ghost twitterers who just tweets continuosly. All she would want is post interesting articles that get re-tweeted and thus increase the followers' numbers and consequently, the popularity.
Twitter has been very careful about spammers and fakes and has been deleting their profiles quite often but can they do anything about this. Definitely not I guess.
So, it's upto you to follow the "celebrity" whose tweets arent always his/her own thoughts
Friday, March 6, 2009
Seeing an Opportunity
I always think how only a few people see an opportunity and succeed when there are potentially millions trying for the same elsewhere, how only a few people are meticulous enough to notice all things around them while others simply run behind one another
An interesting anecdote that made me realize this.
I regularly visit a friend of mine a few miles away. On way to his home, there's a turning where the road is terrible with a huge pothole right at the crossing. I was wary of the road condition and used to slow down at that point and tried to squeeze my bike towards the narrow end of the road where there was little asphalt. I used to feel elated at times when I carefully managed to traverse it.
Little did I knew(atleast for 2-3 weeks) that the other half of the road was clean without any major crack. I always took this half as it reduced my distance(barely by a few meters) and I actually violated the rule by doing so - driving on the wrong side. Suddenly , when I noticed the lane I was supposed to take, I was surprised that I didn't need to slow down , worry of any damage to my bike or worry about any traffic in the opposite direction.
I wondered whether that's how we see opportunities in life too, trying to squeeze past the mundane ones and neglecting the really good ones. Always stuck in a disinterested job and unaware of the interesting ones. Worrying about the obstacle ahead rather than trying to find a solution.
I guess that's why only few people reach the top and others are left behind wondering why they couldn't.
An interesting anecdote that made me realize this.
I regularly visit a friend of mine a few miles away. On way to his home, there's a turning where the road is terrible with a huge pothole right at the crossing. I was wary of the road condition and used to slow down at that point and tried to squeeze my bike towards the narrow end of the road where there was little asphalt. I used to feel elated at times when I carefully managed to traverse it.
Little did I knew(atleast for 2-3 weeks) that the other half of the road was clean without any major crack. I always took this half as it reduced my distance(barely by a few meters) and I actually violated the rule by doing so - driving on the wrong side. Suddenly , when I noticed the lane I was supposed to take, I was surprised that I didn't need to slow down , worry of any damage to my bike or worry about any traffic in the opposite direction.
I wondered whether that's how we see opportunities in life too, trying to squeeze past the mundane ones and neglecting the really good ones. Always stuck in a disinterested job and unaware of the interesting ones. Worrying about the obstacle ahead rather than trying to find a solution.
I guess that's why only few people reach the top and others are left behind wondering why they couldn't.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)